Rose Marie Nijkamp vs Isis Louise Van Den Broek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Jun at 11:17 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Marie Nijkamp vs I. Louise Van Den Broek

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nijkamp 1 - 0 Broek
They have played 3 sets in total, with Rose Marie Nijkamp winning 2 and Isis Louise Van Den Broek winning 1. The last match between Rose Marie Nijkamp and Isis Louise Van Den Broek was at the W15 Alkmaar, 29-06-2025, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Rose Marie Nijkamp getting the victory 1-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nijkamp | 1 |
| Broek | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) W15 Alkmaar(06-29-25)
R. M. Nijkamp vs I. L. V. D. Broek H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $2,585 |
| 61.19% (41-26) | Career Total W/L | 64.55% (71-39) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
R. M. Nijkamp vs I. L. V. D. Broek Match Preview:
- Which player has the edge in second serve performance? Broek slightly leads with 38.21% versus Nijkamp's 37.16% in recent form, indicating a marginally stronger second serve.
- In return games, who excels more on second serves? Nijkamp has a significant advantage, winning 59.78% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Broek's 49.37%.
- For first serve returns, Broek has a slight edge with 38.82% over Nijkamp’s 35.5%, which is useful in determining the favorite in this matchup.
- Analyzing the ability to save breakpoints, Nijkamp maintains a slight lead, saving 42.47% compared to Broek's 40.83%, hinting at better composure under pressure.
- How do their win rates compare over the last year? Broek has a higher win rate at 67.31% compared to Nijkamp’s 64%.
- Both players perform best on clay, but Broek has a marginally better win percentage of 67% compared to Nijkamp’s 63%.
- When considering event levels, Broek demonstrates higher performance, winning 72.09% of Futures/ITF matches versus Nijkamp's 62.5%.
- Broek faced tougher competition, playing against opponents with an average rank of 420.15, while Nijkamp faced those averaging a rank of 492.08.
- In deciding sets, Nijkamp prevails more frequently, winning 75% of such matches versus Broek’s 59%.
- Broek is superior in breakpoint conversion with 46.95%, as opposed to Nijkamp's 37.31% conversion rate, indicating better capitalizing on opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (June 29, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match offers an intriguing comparison between Broek and Nijkamp, each showcasing distinct strengths. Broek's higher effectiveness on second serves and superior breakpoint conversion suggest an edge in execution during key moments.
Nijkamp’s return game prowess, especially against opponents' second serves, presents a formidable challenge to Broek. Moreover, Nijkamp's consistent performance in deciding sets could be pivotal if the match extends that far.
Overall, Broek's recent consistency playing against higher-ranked opponents and superior win percentage on familiar surfaces seem to tip the balance slightly in their favor.
Based on available statistics, Broek appears more likely to secure victory in this matchup.
Rose Marie Nijkamp vs Isis Louise Van Den Broek Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. M. Nijkamp vs I. L. V. D. Broek H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 13 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:21:48 | Average Match Time | 2:21:48 |
| 67% (57/85) | 1st Serve % | 75% (64/85) |
| 67% (38/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (39/64) |
| 39% (11/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 44% (4/9) |
| 42% (36/85) | Return Points Win % | 42% (36/85) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. M. Nijkamp Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | W | 7-5 3-6 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 7-5 | ||
F | W | 6-2 7-5 | ||
SF | W | 7-5 6-1 | ||
I. L. V. D. Broek Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | ||

R. M. Nijkamp vs I. L. V. D. Broek Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.19% (41/26) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.55% (71/39) |
| 60.13% (92/61) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.18% (156/99) |
| 53.98% (752/641) | Games Win/Loss | 54.71% (1273/1054) |
| 52.94% (9/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.71% (22/12) |
| 64.00% (32/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.20% (47/24) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 56 | Aces Total | 53 |
| 0.66 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 450 | Total Double Faults | 382 |
| 1:41:55 | Average Match Time | 1:37:56 |
| 390.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 441.53 |
| 61% (2642/4326) | 1st Serve % | 68% (4703/6872) |
| 60% (1582/2642) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (2718/4703) |
| 40% (677/1684) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (979/2169) |
| 53% (321/609) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 54% (491/911) |
| 50% (2144/4281) | Return Points Win % | 49% (3330/6782) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 55.17% (16/13) | Challenger W/L | 59.46% (22/15) |
| 65.79% (25/13) | Futures W/L | 68.12% (47/22) |
| 61% (41/67) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (71/110) |
| 38% (3/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (9/15) |
| 47% (9/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (21/35) |
| 88% (42/37) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (71/64) |
| 12% (42/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (71/7) |
| 16% (25/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (39/7) |